Home

Nice bench – clothes optional

by

A trip to RHS Bridgewater to see the recently completed Chinese Garden.

The gardens provided plenty of memorial benches to add to the Open Benches site – actually so many it became a challenge to find one that did not bear a commemorative plaque. One was notably nice:

There was also displays of photographs by Yan Wang Preston dotted through the woodland collectively known as Goose Poo & Rainbow. These showed objects that had been found whilst clearing the site for the garden. One intriguing picture was of a faded and charred piece of paper with the instructions to “Take your clothes off”.

From ADB to SCSI

by

I share Jim Nielsen’s delight in the words of Tyler Gaw:

I just dug to the bottom of my Big Box of Cables to find two cables that I needed for something. They’ve been in the bottom for 10+ years. So, “when are you ever gonna use these?” was today. Don’t ever let anyone take your Big Box of Cables away.

Four cardboard boxes storing redundant cables

My box of cables and gubbins had expanded to four boxes which are augmented by a stack of drawers and hanging racks for those likely to be needed more often.

Rack of hanging assorted cables

Have we reached a point where we can fill an alphabet: ADB, BNC, DIN … RSS-422, SCART, SCSI? Leave it with me.

Database slop

by

Who needs AI when we can generate our own slop?

My home address seems to have found itself on the National Database for gas suppliers and I am now receiving a bill for the supply of gas. This is despite the fact that I do not have a gas supply. Just how my address is randomly associated with an account without any kind of verification remains a mystery to be resolved once I navigate the Kafkaesque “customer services” of British Gas and disentangle my address from their database. Should you also find yourself drowning in the inefficacy of British Gas “customer services” I found this form actually reached people who may be able to do something to help.

The UK government has a General Register cataloguing our births marriages and deaths since 1837 (with some gaps). This is very useful when documenting a family history except so much of it is wrong. The errors are mostly from the transcribing of the original hand written records but it does mean everything needs to be questioned and double checked before being accepted.

Just because it is in the database does not mean it is correct. Bring on our AI future. What could possibly go wrong?

Name? Age? Who knows?

by

The Buckinghamshire Archives said…

We’ve had a few enquiries come in after chatbots told researchers that we hold documents we don’t actually look after

…in response to a warning from the ICRC about AI nonsense-bots generating fabricated references because they are designed to spew out something that looks like an answer even if there is no answer available.

Having fallen down a family history rabbit hole recently it seems that such erroneous content is not limited to AI bots.

    Birth dates before 1st July 1837, when a national register started, are endlessly variable and a person may have five or more different years recorded as their birth year during their lifetime.
    As old records are handwritten details such as surnames may not be deciphered correctly.
    Just because somebody ticked the box confirming that all the information provided on a census form is true and accurate does not mean that all the information provided on the form is true and/or accurate.
    The transcribers of census forms can miss people from a listing because they were ‘hidden’ on the next page.
    Even if somebody is included in another family tree it does not mean that person actually existed.